Report ON THE MANUSCRIPT

Please mark with a SERIAL NUMBER if applicable

Ο  Topic suitable

(1. Yes, 2. Marginal, 3. Not at all)                  

Comments:

Ο  Information

(1. Original, 2. Confirmatory, 3. Trivial/nonsense)

Comments:

Ο  Academic value

(1. Excellent, 2. Sound/partly sound, 3. Poor/doubtful)

Comments:

Ο INTRODUCTION

(1. importance of studying of topic, 2. Convincing rationale of study, 3. Review of Literature on topic)

Comments:

Ο Data

(1. Appropriate/Sufficiently large, 2. Appropriate but too limited, 3.Inappropriate)

Comments:

Ο  Methods

(1. Appropriate for aims, 2. Too simple, 3. Inappropriate/erroneous)

Comments:

Ο  Discussion/conclusions

(1. Correct/warranted by results, 2. Mainly correct 3. Wrong preliminary/speculative)

Comments:

Ο  References

(1. Complete/adequate, 2. Sufficient, 3. Insufficient/partly irrelevant)

Comments:

Ο  Title

(1. Clear/adequate, 2. Needs modification, 3. Inappropriate)

Comments:

Ο Figures

(1. Appropriate/excellent quality, 2. Adequate, 3. Poor quality/messy)

Comments:

Ο Tables

(1. Appropriate/clearly presented, 2. Adequate, 3. Messy/inadequate number)

Comments:

Ο KEYWORDS

(Appropriate, 2. Not repeat terms used in the article title, 3. Inadequate/unclear)

Comments:

Ο Abstract

(1. Clear/adequate, 2. Minor revisions, 3. Inadequate/unclear)

Comments:

Ο  Language

(1. Correct grammar and style, 2. Minor corrections needed 3. Poor, needs major revision)

Comments:

Ο conclusion and and recommendations to Editors

Ο Status of the paper

1.  Accepted

2. Acceptable after minor revision

3. Acceptable after moderate revision. No need to referee again

4. Acceptable after substantial revision. Needs to be re-referred

5. Rejected

6. Other

7. Finally Accepted /Rejected]